News Flash 652: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Bluespotted cornetfish (Fistularia commersonii)

News Flash 652

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

Health Policy Analysis in LMICs Seminar Series: Spring 2026 lineup announced (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

Global economy must move past GDP to avoid planetary disaster, warns UN chief

Social Innovation in Health Initiative

How African Governments Responded to the 2025 Aid Shock

Event registration: Reimagining financing in conflict-affected settings: lessons from education, health and social protection 25 Feb 2026

WHO Executive Board Adopts New Efficiency Measures But Can They Stick?

EB 158 – Constituency statement of Knowledge Ecology International, Health Action International, Global Health Council, World Council of Churches, and Oxfam International: WHO’s work in health emergencies

Medicines Law & Policy statement at WHO PABS negotiations (IGWG 5)

The Untold Story of Herbal Medicine in Zambia’s COVID-19 Response: Why African Governments Must Invest in Traditional Health Systems  by Muunda Mudenda

Webinar registration: IFIC Forum Discussion on Information and Technology (Nine Pillars of Integrated Care) Feb 24, 2026

Historic Africa-Led HIV Vaccine Trial Begins in South Africa

HRR804. NEOLIBERALISM: DO YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS? (George Monbiot)

Rethinking health-care systems to tackle social isolation and frailty

Time For State-Based Single Payer: The New York Health Act

‘After Decades of Denial and Silence, the Suffering of Rohingya People Is Being Heard at the World’s Highest Court’

Pakistan’s Baloch students are vanishing, and no one is held accountable

Helping care reach people in Daraya after years of war

Ten ways to build a new narrative for humanitarianism

Over four million girls still at risk of female genital mutilation: UN leaders call for sustained commitment and investment to end FGM

Closing the Gender Gap in Women’s Health and Labour Force Participation: G20 Call To Action  by Jeanette  Olorunniwo and Dhristi Agarwal

Science academies failing to put women at the top

A decolonial feminist perspective on gender equality programming in the Global South

The real ‘nanny tax’? Not being able to breastfeed your own baby

Three African countries agree to UK migrant returns after visa penalty threat

Floods and Food Security: The Hidden Cost to Crops and Soil

UK to cut climate finance to poor countries by a fifth despite promising more help

Intervention research to protect human health in the era of climate extremes

EU-banned pesticides widely used in Latin America

A Business Necessity: Align With Nature or Risk Collapse, IPBES Report Warns

Why Health Must Be Central to Climate Adaptation – Right from the Start

 

 

 

 

 

 

Closing the Gender Gap in Women’s Health and Labour Force Participation: G20 Call To Action

IN A NUTSHELL
Authors' Note



Renewed policy action that places women’s health at the focal point of the agenda is essential if the international economic targets are to be met. Especially because closing the women’s health gap will potentially yield economic gains that will have a world changing impact and transform lives.

Effective governance for women’s health must include: national task forces that are truly representative and dedicated to addressing women’s health system gaps. Annual reporting mechanisms linking women’s health outcomes to budget cycles, regulatory reforms that accelerate the approval and integration of women-focused technologies while meeting clinical safety standards, mandatory diagnostic referral standards that ensure timely investigation after repeated presentations and cross-sector coordination between officials in the health, finance, labour, and digital ministries. Political commitment must be converted into measurable policy action. Without these reforms in governance structures, women’s health remains dependent on individual initiatives rather than the systemic change necessary to drive economic growth

By Jeanette  Olorunniwo

Program Assistant

Dhristi Agarwal

Women’s Health Innovation Policy Associate

The Dove Foundation for Global Change

Closing the Gender Gap in Women’s Health and Labour Force Participation

G20 Call To Action

 

No country can achieve sustained economic growth, human capital expansion, or long-term stability when half its population experiences disproportionately high rates of preventable ill health. Despite this, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death among women, responsible for approximately 33% of female deaths globally. Even with this significant burden, it continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated, as women’s symptom profiles can vary from those traditionally emphasised in medical education and clinical guidelines. Maternal mortality remains one of the clearest indicators of inequality in women’s health. Every day, 700 women die from pregnancy-related causes, while 16 babies die every two minutes. Breast and cervical cancer outcomes are still major areas of health inequity as they depend largely on geography and income and screening access is inconsistent.

Unfortunately, these patterns are not isolated anomalies, they reflect systematic flaws in research priorities and clinical standards across health systems globally. These harmful attitudes recur at many points: reproductive health conditions are frequently normalised or dismissed, autoimmune disorders are often misattributed and minimised to solely psychological causes, chronic pain conditions are often deprioritised in clinical assessment and do not incur thorough investigation or referral. The issue is not limited to individual clinician behaviour, it is evidence of the effects of bias and inequity in how women’s health needs are conceptualised, studied, and addressed.

Women worldwide routinely encounter delays in diagnosis, fragmented care, and health systems insufficiently designed around their biological, social, and economic needs. We aim to draw attention to the fact that the consequence of these failures results in women spending extended periods of their lives living with undiagnosed, untreated, or inadequately managed conditions. This is certainly the case in conditions such as as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Hashimoto’s disease, and thyroid disorders. In many of these cases women’s symptoms are deprioritised until the condition becomes chronic. This manifests in reduced workforce participation, diminished productivity, increased health and social care costs, and broader constraints on national economic performance.

It is profoundly evident that women’s health is not just a sectoral or socio-political issue, it is one of the most powerful macroeconomic levers available to governments today. The paradox of women’s life expectancy vs years spent in good health is an issue that The Dove Foundation of Global Change (DFGC) is calling the G20 parliamentarians and policy makers to invest efforts and resources into solving. The pledges of the past have sparked various action and initiatives aimed at addressing these issues, however the economic burden persists. The Brisbane Goal outlined in 2014 had a clear aim: “Reduce the gender gap in labour force participation by 25% by 2025” from which the phrase ‘25 by 25’ emerged. However, the G20 cannot uphold such commitments as women’s health problems still prevent millions from maximising their productivity and workforce participation. As 2025 has ended, the failure of the G20 to secure significant progress in obtaining the Brisbane Goal warrants a thorough reexamination of the attitudes and actions required to attain the economic benchmarks envisioned. Renewed policy action that places women’s health at the focal point of the agenda is essential if the international economic targets are to be met. Especially because closing the women’s health gap will potentially yield economic gains that will have a world changing impact and transform lives.

Amongst the G20 nations sits over 80% of global GDP and approximately ⅔ of the global population. The evidence strongly indicates that closing the women’s health gap could unlock $400 billion in global GDP annually by 2040 realized mainly within G20 economies. While some progress has been made with 9 of the G20 countries meeting the Brisbane goal, the 2040 $400 billion GDP gains annual target can only be actualised when all nations prioritise addressing the prevalent challenges within women’s healthcare. With 9 of the 20 nations engaging with the objectives of the Brisbane goal the workforce had a potential expansion of 100 million workers; this effect would only be multiplied by the cooperation of the remaining 11 nations. The cost of inaction is very high, data published by McKinsey demonstrates that:

  • 3.9 billion women worldwide spend 25 % more of their lives in poor health than men
  • 75 million disability‑adjusted life‑years lost through illness
  • Billions is lost in potential GDP earnings annually in high income countries due to illnesses that disproportionately affect women

According to the Global Alliance for Women’s Health working groups “addressing health disparities could have a greater impact on mortality for conditions affecting life span than any single treatment studied in recent clinical trials.”

Lucy Pérez Senior Partner with McKinsey & Company states: “There is a tremendous opportunity to support the health of women, and a clear business case for making these investments.” The multiplier effect that national economies will experience for targeted investment into women’s health research is significant. The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine have identified the impact of investing in women’s healthcare on the advancement of socioeconomic development. Their new Global Investment Framework showed that increasing health expenditure by just $5 per person per year up to 2035 could yield up to 9 times that value in economic and social growth as improvement in maternal health will cause better childhood outcomes producing higher future earnings. These gains could also be achieved by an additional investment of $30 billion per year, equivalent to a 2% increase above current spending.

Not only is an investment in gender-specific research and treatment pathways for these underrepresented conditions necessary, there is also a need to review the leadership structures in these spaces. Women make up 76% of the unpaid care work force globally. The underrepresentation of women in health leadership roles, despite their dominance in the health workforce, creates persistent blind spots in policy, procurement, and regulatory frameworks. Addressing women’s health requires intentional governance reforms. The McKinsey Health Institute in collaboration with the World Economic Forum released a report that established 5 key pillars that create the blueprint foreclosing the gender health gap- an initiative they predict could be a ‘$1trillion dollar opportunity to improve lives and economies’:

  • Count women- improve data collection methodologies
  • Study women- conduct specific research on the drivers and effects of sex-based differences
  • Care for women- adopt guidelines that align with the evidence for gender-specific care
  • Include all women- retain an emphasis on health equity and inclusion
  • Invest in women- dedicate resources to support women’s health R&D and leadership

Effective governance for women’s health must include: national task forces that are truly representative and dedicated to addressing women’s health system gaps. Annual reporting mechanisms linking women’s health outcomes to budget cycles, regulatory reforms that accelerate the approval and integration of women-focused technologies while meeting clinical safety standards, mandatory diagnostic referral standards that ensure timely investigation after repeated presentations and cross-sector coordination between officials in the health, finance, labour, and digital ministries. Political commitment must be converted into measurable policy action. Without these reforms in governance structures, women’s health remains dependent on individual initiatives rather than the systemic change necessary to drive economic growth.

The Dove Foundation for Global Change is making the following recommendations to the G20 nations:

  • Establish a multi-sectoral G20 taskforce that convenes healthcare policymakers, health regulators, industry leaders, civil society, academic institutions, and research organizations to develop an urgent implementation plan for women’s health.
  • At the national level, each G20 country must create an immediate women’s health taskforce comprising civil society, research institutions, the private sector, and relevant government bodies to accelerate action on women’s health challenges and gaps.
  • Issue a call for R&D investment in new innovations addressing the full care pathway for women’s health conditions.
  • Members of Parliament pledging to champion this initiative must publicly commit to prioritizing women’s health and backing diagnostic and treatment programmes for their constituents.
  • Local hospitals and physicians must ensure that women presenting with identical health conditions across two separate visits receive immediate referral for further diagnostic testing.

The ramifications of the efforts of this campaign and the subsequent positive actions taken by the G20 nations to support the campaign will extend far beyond individual women. Investors, researchers, academics, non-profit organisations, life science institutions, and government bodies have vested interests in advancing women’s health. Healthier women are the bedrock of strong families, dynamic communities, thriving workplace environments, and durable economies. This signals promise within the commercial marketplace with the prospect for new products and services relating to the women’s healthcare ecosystem to emerge. Improving women’s health throughout their lives could drive at least $1 trillion in additional combined annual economic growth by 2040. Investing in women’s health is not simply a gender issue; it is a macro‑economic imperative that safeguards the prosperity of our societies as a whole.

 

References

https://www.mckinsey.com/mhi/media-center/new-report-highlights-one-trillion-potential-of-closing-womens-health-gap

https://www.mckinsey.com/mhi/our-insights/blueprint-to-close-the-womens-health-gap-how-to-improve-lives-and-economies-for-all

https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/1726191/

https://www.weforum.org/publications/closing-the-women-s-health-gap-a-1-trillion-opportunity-to-improve-lives-and-economies/

https://www.nature.com/articles/s44222-024-00253-7

https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/369/bmj.m1175.full.pdf

 

The Untold Story of Herbal Medicine in Zambia’s COVID-19 Response: Why African Governments Must Invest in Traditional Health Systems

IN A NUTSHELL
Author's Note 
In my most recent role (2023-2025), I worked as a Scientific Officer at the National Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research (NISIR), Zambia. In that time, I led a team of Natural Products Research activities, including study design, methods development, report writing, results dissemination, and community outreach initiatives. I also planned, mobilised, and delivered two online public lectures: (1) “Quality and Safety of Herbal Medicines” and (2) “HERBS vs. HARDSHIP: Can Herbal Medicines Save Lives in a Post-USAID Era?”

Furthermore, I served as a member of the Technical Experts (Equipment Sub-Committee) for the $2.5 million NISIR Modernisation Project, a government initiative under the Ministry of Technology and Science aimed at enhancing NISIR's research and development capacity.

This article is a product of my time there, and it summarises the two presentations I made at scientific conferences in Mauritius and South Africa

 By Muunda Mudenda

PhD Student

Laboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics

Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University

Czech Republic 

The Untold Story of Herbal Medicine in Zambia’s COVID-19 Response

 Why African Governments Must Invest in Traditional Health Systems

 

What Really Happened?

The recent COVID-19 global pandemic had several life-changing effects on the social and economic realities of many societies worldwide. For one, we realised how fragile life is due to the 7 million deaths resulting from more than 770 million confirmed infections.

Economically, lockdown measures translated into the loss of jobs and livelihoods for many people in both the developed and developing worlds. Some large and small businesses slowed their operations, while others had to downsize to accommodate the new reality and stay afloat.

While all this was happening, African countries also realised the gaps in their healthcare systems. We understood how underfunded the systems are, how access to healthcare is poor, how we have insufficient medications, overwhelmed staff, weak R&D (facilities, human resources), and a significant lack of manufacturing capacity for diagnostic tools and vaccines.

Interestingly, the pandemic also highlighted an untapped resource – our wealth of natural products and traditional medicine.

In the heat of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020 – 2023), Zambia experienced the power of indigenous knowledge as urban and rural communities turned to traditional herbal remedies to manage symptoms of the disease. Zambians turned to readily available herbal remedies like concoctions containing ginger, garlic, hibiscus, eucalyptus, and other unidentified herbs as key ingredients to alleviate symptoms such as fevers, headaches, loss of taste, shortness of breath, and chest pains.

Until now, the extent to which herbal medicine formulations curbed the burden of COVID-19 in Zambia has not been reported. Our lab, the Natural Products Laboratory, at the National Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research (NISIR), sought to address this gap by retrospectively investigating the use of Indigenous herbal formulations during the pandemic.

To achieve our research goal, we reviewed publications on three key aspects: scientific contributions, economic activities related to the importation of herbs and spices, and community reports about the use of herbal medicines to prevent or treat COVID-19.

Zambia’s Scientific Contribution to Herbal Medicine Research During COVID-19

Out of 1,101 research studies that were retrieved (2020 – 2023) from four reputable scientific databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and JSTOR), only 0.54% (6) were authored by Zambians, while 1.45% (16) referenced Zambia as one of the countries that relied on herbal medicines during the pandemic. Furthermore, none of the publications reported laboratory or clinical pieces of evidence for the use of herbal medicines as a safe and efficacious intervention. The publications were reviews that combined subjects like politics, philosophy, religion, and economics.

While such interdisciplinary reporting contributed to the description of a broader interest in herbal medicines in the country during the pandemic, it also emphasised the lack of dedicated research on the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of herbal formulations against COVID-19.

Furthermore, successful policy formulations to support the use of medical interventions during a major public health emergency like COVID-19 demand a solid evidence base, which was lacking during Zambia’s COVID-19 experience.

Defining Herbal Medicine During

Herbal medicines, also known as phytomedicines, refer to preparations made from plants’ leaves, bark, roots, seeds, or flowers that are used in Indigenous communities for medicinal purposes.

These preparations were adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic in various traditional medicine practices across different regions of the world. For example, in India, as part of Ayurveda, in China, as part of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and in Africa, as African Traditional Medicine (ATM).

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), these preparations are used by more than 80% of people in developing countries due to low cost, and they also serve as an important reservoir for pharmacological drug development.

The use of traditional medicine as a primary intervention during COVID-19 was also encouraged by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). 

Tracing the Impact of COVID-19 on Import Trends of Herbs and Spices

From the economic point of view, we observed a positive relationship between the number of COVID-19 cases and the demand for herbal imports, particularly during the peak phase of the pandemic. For example, from December 2020 to December 2021, a marked surge in COVID-19 cases escalated from 20,725 to 150,000. Concurrently, Zambia’s import value of herbs and spices increased by 11.53% from approximately $2.95 million to $3.29 million.

As the pandemic transitioned into its second year (December 2021 to December 2022), COVID-19 case numbers fell to 100,000, potentially due to successful vaccine campaigns, improved public awareness, or accumulated natural immunity within the population. Correspondingly, the import value of herbs declined by 8.81% to around $3.00 million.

In the final phase from December 2022 to December 2023, COVID-19 cases continued to decrease to 79,287. Yet, contrary to expectations of a further decline in herb importation, the import value saw a slight rebound to $3.05 million, a 1.67% increase.

This observed relationship between the number of COVID-19 cases and the import value of herbs and spices underscored the influence of public health crises on health-seeking behaviours, particularly in the context where 70% of the Zambian population depends on traditional medicine.

Further research into the long-term impacts of such trends could inform strategies that integrate complementary medicine into public health frameworks, optimising resilience against future public health emergencies.

Community Claims and Use of Herbal Medicines During COVID-19

While the pandemic was partly managed using vaccines and other repurposed drugs such as Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine, these interventions came more than a year after the first case of COVID-19 was reported. Zambia received its first consignment of Oxford’s AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine on 12th April 2021, and yet Zambians still had to survive the disease.

Before the vaccine, the situation was worsened by depleting resources in an already burdened health system with poor access, a lack of bed spaces and drugs, and a dilapidated healthcare infrastructure. Moreover, preventive measures such as the use of hand sanitisers, hand washing soap and nose masks proved expensive for communities that lived below the poverty line.

Vaccine hesitancy was also a major area of concern as many African countries showed scepticism about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines. A report by Afrobarometer about COVID-19 vaccines in Zambia said, “About half of Zambians would choose prayer over a vaccine to prevent getting COVID-19”. Such sentiments about vaccines fueled the use of home-based traditional herbal concoctions, which 70% of the country has relied on since pre-COVID-19 times for various other illnesses.

Interestingly, the use of these remedies was encouraged by both local and international organisations such as the Ministry of Health (MoH), the World Health Organisation (WHO), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), herbal medicines were widely used due to ease of access, low cost, and strong cultural heritage. Local communities embraced herbal medicines to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection symptoms, such as fevers, headaches, diarrhoea, coughs, and fatigue. All this usage was despite the lack of scientific evidence about the safety and efficacy of such herbal concoctions against the disease.

Interestingly, trends about increased use of herbs and spices to prevent and treat COVID-19 were also observed in several other African and non-African countries. For example, Madagascar promoted an Artemisia plant-based herbal tonic called COVID Organics for prevention and treatment. The use of Artemisia annua was also reported in other countries, including Tanzania and China. 

What Needs to Change for Herbal Medicine to Work Better as a Strategy During Public Health Emergencies

There is strong scientific, economic, and social evidence, albeit anecdotal, to suggest that herbal medicines contributed significantly to the reduction of both mortality and morbidity.

Our study concluded that herbal medicines can be leveraged as a strategy to mitigate public health emergencies. This conclusion is also supported by the historical use of herbal medicines during local outbreaks such as HIV/AIDS and Cholera, as well as existing high acceptance rates for solutions that come from herbal medicines.

However, to use herbal medicines as a successful strategy to create pandemic-ready health systems, several efforts must be made:

Establish minimum research funding benchmarks. Currently, research funding remains critically inadequate. African Union member states should commit at least 1% of their national budgets to R&D, which in turn should have a dedicated allocation to traditional medicine research. This would create budget lines with peer accountability through annual AU reporting mechanisms.

Develop national and regional centres of excellence. Each African country requires at least one fully equipped herbal medicine research facility with complete capabilities from phytochemical analysis, pharmacological testing, clinical trials, and GMP-compliant production. These centres should operate under harmonised continental protocols through the regional centres and the African Medicines Agency. This would enable mutual recognition of validated products and rapid deployment during emergencies.

Implement structured public-private-community partnerships. The structures could be designed to include: Tax incentives (5-10 year holidays), matching grants, and benefit-sharing frameworks that attract private investment while protecting traditional knowledge holders. Furthermore, communities must receive royalties from commercialised formulations, with prior informed consent protocols preventing biopiracy.

Integrate herbal medicine into health systems. This includes incorporating evidence-based modules into medical curricula, creating strategic reserves of validated herbal products, and establishing continental pharmacovigilance networks for real-time safety and efficacy monitoring during outbreaks.

These interventions require commitments, primarily from domestic budgets supplemented by development partners. Success metrics should include validated products available, research capacity built, and mortality reduction during health emergencies. With high community acceptance rates already established, these evidence-backed investments will create resilient, locally-grounded pandemic preparedness systems across Africa.

Conclusion

We have the evidence, the community support, and the historical precedent. What we lack is political will. African governments must commit to measurable targets such as publishing national herbal medicine strategies by 2026, doubling research funding by 2027, and establishing regional centres by 2028. Our people deserve pandemic preparedness rooted in solutions that have already saved lives. Once we partner across borders, validate together, then we can deploy everywhere, and our next pandemic response can be built on African solutions.

News Flash 651: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Mediterranean moray (Muraena helena)

News Flash 651

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

On the Cusp of a New Era of Development Cooperation

Legal tools that lower medicines prices have expanded access to medicines for over two decades, research reveals

What will HIV funding look like in 2026?

Six years after COVID-19’s global alarm: Is the world better prepared for the next pandemic?

Preventive cholera vaccination resumes as global supply reaches critical milestone

Why Nigeria may be missing silent mpox transmission

FGS Mislabeled as an STI: The neglected waterborne Parasite Costing African Women Their Dignity

Innovations fast-tracking the end of sleeping sickness in the DRC

Closing equity gaps in the control of schistosomiasis and trachoma

Guinea worm’s near-eradication shows what’s possible for tropical diseases

Social Innovation in Health Initiative advances community-driven solutions for neglected tropical diseases

MSF calls for sustainable access to treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Pakistan

Medicines for treatment of older people in guidelines and essential medicines lists, WHO African Region

Improved long-term care provision in the context of population ageing

Africa has bold cervical cancer plans. Now we must deliver them

Almost 40% of Cancers Could be Prevented by Curbing Tobacco, Infections and Alcohol

Cigarettes, Lies, and Videotape: Study Links Consumer Perceptions with Tobacco Industry Deceptions

Protocol deviations in medicine quality tests

IDD Newsletter: Volume 56, Issue 1, January 2026

Vision Impairment is a $1 Trillion Productivity Problem: What Can Governments Do About It?

Turning Point? Top donor Norway launches total aid policy review

$9.42 Billion for Global Health as US Foreign Aid Bill Passes

UNPO’s new magazine Peoples Represented

UNPO’s new podcast series Hidden Geopolitics

Let’s Change the Way Parents See Their Child with a Disability  by Andrea Cilliers

HRR803. THE WORLD IS PAYING A CATASTROPHIC PRICE FOR TREATING HUMAN RIGHTS AS OPTIONAL. (Ramesh Jaura)

Explainer: Why Nature Is Everyone’s Business

Protecting Africa’s Ocean Future and Why a Precautionary Pause on Deep-sea Mining Matters

The world is far off meeting its growing water needs. Can the UN still lead the response?

Questions are being raised about microplastics studies – here’s what’s solid science and what isn’t

 

 

 

 

Let’s Change the Way Parents See Their Child with a Disability

IN A NUTSHELL
Editor's Note
 Innovative reflections here on how parents should see their child with a disability, as part of the Author’s engagement in behavioral economics to design policies that advance disability inclusion as a core economic and workforce issue.

 As per her belief, ‘...smarter policy starts with human behavior, stronger institutions are built through inclusion, and the most effective global strategies are the ones that work for people first...’

By Andrea Cilliers 

Civil and Human Rights Advocate through the Lens of Behavioral Economics

Washington, D.C., USA

Lets Change the Way Parents See Their Child with a Disability

 

Growing up, I often heard my mom say, “You can fix the medical issue, but you often create an emotionally stunted child.” She said this while spending years at the Children’s Hospital beside my sister as she battled leukemia. My mother had to push through her own fear to let my sister live fully, even in the heaviness of illness. She encouraged other parents to do the same: to give their children as normal a life as possible, despite their circumstance.

Years later, while working with the U.S. Special Advisor on International Disability Rights, she shared an idea that has stayed with me: Parents are the biggest enablers—and disablers—of their children with disabilities. It’s not a moral judgment, it’s a systems observation. Parents must navigate medical equipment, protocols, therapies, and services, all while making their child feel seen, valued, and capable. Families who succeed show us that children with disabilities are not “special cases” to overcome they are human beings to understand and support, just like anyone else.

Many families do the opposite by perpetuating language like “special needs” and “differently abled” in attempt to make a child feel loved. Despite the positive intent, this language signals difference, othering, and a paternalism. By labeling a child’s needs as “special,” we imply that others are doing them a favor by accommodating them. Over time, this framing can reinforce social separation and internalized feelings of being abnormal. Term “differently abled” can call out the way that child with a disability navigates the world when in fact every one is differently abled. Other language we heard included “normal” and “abnormal” children to be able to differentiate between children with and without disabilities. Words shape perception and perception shapes reality.

The challenge is global. In meetings with government officials from former Soviet countries, we discussed efforts to close large institutions in favor of community-based living. Despite the international community calling on governments to deinstitutionalize and the internal desire of these governments to close these institutions, a larger problem of how to change the mindset of parents with children with disabilities looms. Policies alone cannot succeed if parental attitudes remain trapped in fear. Parents naturally want to protect their children, but fear and the social stigma that often accompanies disability can unintentionally limit opportunity. Around the world, harmful practices persist: children are shackled, excluded, or hidden because families lack guidance or support. Change begins not with law alone, but with how parents perceive the worth and potential of their child.

Behavioral economics offers surprisingly practical ways to shift behavior without shaming anyone. For starters, fear can be reframed. Parents are exquisitely loss-averse, so instead of highlighting what could go wrong, we can focus on what might be lost: “Avoiding age-appropriate experiences now can quietly limit independence later.” Growth can be made the default: automatic inclusion in activities, short trial periods, and a presumption of competence allow for parents to take a first step.

Clarity reduces fear. Rather than vague encouragement, concrete pathways help parents understand exactly what will happen, with safety nets in place: “Here’s what happens on day one, week three, and if it doesn’t work.” Peer stories matter more than expert advice—parents trust other parents who share their experience. Hearing that “we didn’t think our child was ready either” and “here is how we navigated the barriers” can normalize risk and make inclusion feel possible.

It’s important to acknowledge that a parents’ natural instinct is to protect their child. Rather than telling a parent that they shouldn’t be so protective, we can redirect. Instead of “letting go,” parents can “add supports so their child can try.” Instead of “pushing,” they can “practice independence safely.” Small, time-bound experiments can build confidence, reshape beliefs, and create momentum. And professionals must model the right behavior; over-cautious language or deficit-focused reports inadvertently reinforce parental fear.

Parents aren’t holding their children back intentionally, they’re responding rationally to systems that over-penalize risk and under-support growth. Behavior change rarely happens all at once. It unfolds gradually through repeated experiences, small successes, and supportive structures. Over time, habits shift, expectations rise, and even identity transforms.

At its core, this isn’t just about parenting or policy—it’s about designing environments that unlock human potential. When growth is easier and safer than caution, children with disabilities can thrive. Parents, freed from fear, can act with both love and possibility. And the world begins to see, not just what could go wrong, but everything that could go right.

News Flash 650: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Vulcano island (crater rim), Italy

News Flash 650

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

Reflections on the World Economic Forum: AI, Geopolitics, and Biothreats

Aid off course – How ODA reform has left the Global South behind

Webinar registration: When Women Lead: Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation Feb 6, 2026

Seminar registration: Ethics of Research in Emergencies, Friday, January 30, 2026

Webinar registration: Patterns of financialisation and impacts of corporatisation of healthcare – An Indian case study with global dimensions Jan 30, 2026

Webinar registration: PABS Negotiations at a Crossroads: Equity Promises, Emerging Loopholes, and Global Biosecurity Risks Jan 29, 2026

WHO statement on notification of withdrawal of the United States

US loses Gavi board seat after withholding funding

One year after US aid freeze, HIV care in Africa is in retreat

US to expand anti-abortion aid rule to cover ‘gender ideology,’ diversity

The Fall of Public Trust and Public Health in the U.S.  by Laura H. Kahn 

Immigration Enforcement in Minnesota: Not Just a Political, also a Public Health Crisis

WE HAVE A DREAM  by Juan Garay 

DNDi and APHRC sign MoU to forge strategic alliance to bridge research and capacity enhancement gaps

‘Suspended or Cancelled’: Guinea-Bissau Health Minister Halts Controversial Hepatitis B Trial

UK loses its measles elimination status

Ethiopia Declares End to First-Ever Marburg Outbreak

World NTD Day 2026

Time to put Scrub Typhus higher on the public health agenda

MPP welcomes Coefficient Giving as a new partner to expand access to non-communicable disease medicines

Celebrating Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Prevention

Is Lead Poisoning a Missing Link in the Fight Against Malnutrition?

WHO: Healthy diet

HRR802. FIVE YEARS TO THE COUNTDOWN AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO GET THERE. WE THUS NEED TO REWRITE THE MANY CONGRATULATORY SPEECHES AND ARTICLES ABOUT THE SDGs

From Hamburg to Uganda: how an NGO learned to reinvent itself

Resisting the Rule of the Rich: Defending Freedom Against Billionaire Power

In Gaza today, death does not need a missile. Rain alone is enough

Fighting Traffickers with Conservation Justice: Tiffany Gobert

Half of Fossil Fuel Carbon Emissions in 2024 Came From 32 Companies

How climate change is burning Kenya’s outdoor workers

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Fall of Public Trust and Public Health in the U.S.

IN A NUTSHELL
Author's Note 
Public health is a public good and requires public trust to succeed.

Public health is inherently political because the focus is on population health rather than on individual health.

In this article, I will briefly write about the history of public health and will try to explain why the U.S.’s public health policies, particularly its vaccination policies, are deteriorating

By Laura H. Kahn, MD, MPH, MPP

Co-Founder, One Health Initiative

By the same Author on PEAH: see HERE

The Fall of Public Trust and Public Health in the U.S.

 

Public health is a public good and requires public trust to succeed. Clean air, clean water, and sanitation are nonexcludable meaning that everyone can benefit from them. While public health’s advantages such as sanitation are obvious, their successful implementation in Western Europe and Northern America took over a century to achieve. Public health laws were passed, not because they benefited people’s lives, but because industries needed a healthy workforce to make money. To the detriment of many developing nations, basic public health services remain unavailable because government and industry leaders are not willing to invest in them.

Vaccines are another essential public good because of the herd immunity they provide against communicable diseases. Their success also requires public trust. I’ve written about the importance of vaccines. Unfortunately, opposition to vaccines has existed since the days of Dr. Edward Jenner. The British medical profession at that time supported the practice of variolation and was resistant to switching to vaccination. Anti-vaccinationists opposed vaccination for religious reasons believing that substances from God’s lower creatures were harmful. (They ignored the fact that they ingested food from God’s lower creatures every day).

Public health is inherently political because the focus is on population health rather than on individual health. For herd immunity (or Community Immunity Threshold) to be effective, particularly for highly communicable diseases such as measles, at least 92 to 94 percent of the population must be immune. Essentially, virtually all the population must be vaccinated against the disease. Vaccine mandates are required to achieve this level of coverage. For a variety of reasons, including misinformation about vaccines and misunderstanding of how immunity works, some people oppose getting vaccinated or getting their children or pets vaccinated. This lack of public trust jeopardizes public health’s goal of preventing disease. Prevention is preferable to treatment, which in some cases, is virtually impossible.

In this article, I will briefly write about the history of public health and will try to explain why the U.S.’s public health policies, particularly its vaccination policies, are deteriorating.

Public Health Beginnings

During the Middle Ages, epidemics were believed to be spread by miasmas, bad air, and caused by divine retribution for sinful behavior. This belief led to untold suffering and death.

Partly inspired by the American Revolution on the premise that “all men were created equal” the French Revolution caused tremendous social upheaval, creating fertile ground for improving public health. French scientists such as Drs. Louis-Rene Villerme (1782-1863) and Alexandre Parent Duchatelet (1790-1835) dedicated their careers to studying how society could improve people’s lives.

Impressed by the French efforts of social reform, Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), an English utilitarian philosopher proposed Poor Laws to improve the lives of the poor, working class because he believed that everyone deserved a happy life without pain, not just the wealthy.

A devastating cholera outbreak that hit England from 1832 to 1848 led to the Public Health Act of 1848 that aimed to build sewers, remove waste, and provide fresh water. This act was largely ignored. Almost thirty years passed before the Public Health Act of 1875 resulted in the enforcement of the laws initially passed in 1848.

In the late 19th century, Louis Pasteur developed the rabies vaccine, the second vaccine to be developed after the smallpox vaccine. Pasteur realized that attenuated microbes could provide immunity against deadly diseases. His discovery paved the way for the field of immunology and for the development of other vaccines to prevent disease.

Public Health in the U.S.

The U.S. Constitution was written when medical practice was based on the Four Humors using lancets and leeches. At the time, physicians were more likely to kill their patients than to cure them. The germ theory of disease would not be discovered for another century. Not surprisingly, the right to a doctor was not included in the document.

In addition, disease outbreaks became primarily a state and local concern. This created a patchwork network across the country because each state and local government had its own rules and regulations. Public health funding was dependent upon state and local taxes and was chronically underfunded. (Americans don’t like paying taxes, so public health remains severely underfunded. Indeed, the country was founded largely in part because the colonialists refused to pay British taxes. “Taxation without representation is tyranny,” was a popular slogan.) The role of the federal government was to keep scourges outside the country and to provide support to state and local governments.

Each state developed its own vaccination policies. Traditionally, these policies have been developed using non-partisan, evidence-based federal recommendations. However, the Trump Administration appointed vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.) as Secretary of Health and Human Services who fired the entire Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Replacing them, he appointed vocal opponents to vaccine use in pregnancy.

They revised the ACIP recommendations which led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to change their childhood vaccination schedule from 17 to 11 vaccines. In response, at least 20 states have announced that they will not adhere to these new guidelines.

Meanwhile, herd immunity has dropped low enough to result in vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks not seen in decades. Measles has become resurgent in many states.

Covid-19’s Impact on Public Trust in the U.S.

The U.S. had the 15th highest mortality rate and the highest total number of deaths (over 1 million) during the Covid-19 pandemic.  President Trump oversaw the federal response to the rapidly spreading, deadly pandemic. His actions and inactions have been attributed to the excess deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.

A Cornell University study found that Trump was the largest source of misinformation such as recommending the use of hydroxychloroquine, bleach, and other “miracle cures” against the virus. He refused to wear a face mask in public and downplayed the severity of the disease. He scapegoated Asian-Americans by calling the coronavirus “kung flu” leading to a rise in hate crimes. The Covid origins controversy further fueled public distrust in science and the government.

The CDC issued contaminated testing kits which led to a loss in credibility and public confidence in the agency. Severe shortages in personal protective equipment including face masks jeopardized the lives of healthcare workers. Hospital budgeting to maximize profits did not factor in supply redundancies needed to respond to a pandemic. The spike in demand for supplies led to a system shock.

The rugged individualism of American culture made it deeply unsuitable for the collective action needed to respond to the pandemic. Many refused to wear face masks, citing infringement on personal liberties. Ethnic strife and entrenched racism contributed to further social discord. Lockdown rules seemed arbitrary and were deleterious for schools and businesses. Public health workers received hate mail and death threats because people didn’t like their policy recommendations. Up to 30 percent of the healthcare workforce retired, resigned, or left the field resulting in worsening shortages.

When the Covid-19 vaccine became available, many refused to get vaccinated. Watching Fox News contributed to a decline in willingness for vaccination.

The Second Trump Administration

For reasons outside the scope of this article, the US is now confronting a collapse in its federal leadership and government. Public trust is at an all-time low. Public health is deteriorating. The U.S. has withdrawn from the World Health Organization.

People are dying.

Unfamiliar with the perils of fascism, authoritarianism, and loss of human rights, the American public is slowly waking up as to why generations before them fought and died for justice, freedom, and liberty. Checks and balances, rights and laws are only adhered to if they are respected and enforced. The American experience should serve as a cautionary tale for democracies that elect individuals, such as convicted felons, who are unqualified to hold power. Collective insanity committing atrocities can happen anywhere given the right conditions.

 

(Author’s note: My book “Who’s in Charge? Leadership During Epidemics, Bioterror Attacks, and Other Public Health Crises,” published in 2020 (2nd edition) partly informed this article.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WE HAVE A DREAM

IN A NUTSHELL
Author's Note 
I’m sharing a short manifesto titled “We Have a Dream,” written in a collective voice and inspired, among other sources, by reflections and data presented in the SHEM webinars. It is a humble attempt to connect structural violence, health equity, and the need for life-centered alternatives.

I offer it simply as a contribution for reflection

By Juan Garay

Co-Chair of the Sustainable Health Equity Movement (SHEM)

Professor/Researcher of Health Equity, Ethics and Metrics (Spain, Mexico, Cuba, Brazil)

Founder of Valyter Ecovillage (valyter.es)

By the same Author on PEAH: see HERE

WE HAVE A DREAM

 

We come together at a turning point in human history.

We speak not from comfort, but from urgency.

Not from hatred, but from responsibility.

Not as leaders or experts, but as people—

people who refuse to normalize suffering.

We live in a world governed by a global political system that too often bows to force instead of justice. A world where bullying threats replace dialogue, where international law bends before military and economic power, and where the United Nations Security Council—entrusted with peace—has repeatedly enabled wars, occupations, and genocides through action, inaction, and veto.

This is not a failure of ideals.

It is a failure of structures.

Alongside this political order stands an economic system that has escaped all democratic control. A system where gigantic asset managers concentrate wealth and power at an exponential pace, turning governments into administrators of market interests and reducing human beings to costs, risks, or data points.

This system rewards extraction over care, accumulation over life, and profit over truth. It is a global dictatorship of money, exercised by a few and endured by billions.

To sustain it, another form of domination expands quietly: the domination of attention. Through screens that occupy an ever-growing share of human time, media power increasingly shapes thoughts, fears, and desires. It trains passivity, accelerates individualism, and transforms citizens into isolated consumers—disconnected from land, community, and one another.

At the same time, unnatural borders fragment humanity and ecosystems alike, dividing what life itself has never divided. These borders justify exclusion, war, and exploitation, while masking the fact that the Earth is one, and our fate is shared.

From the highest global institutions to national governments; from academia to corporations; from economic bodies to religious hierarchies, a subtle but constant violence flows downward. The violence of command without listening. The violence of hierarchy without accountability. The violence of authority that normalizes obedience and silences dissent.

This structural violence is not abstract.

According to analyses presented in the SHEM webinars on sustainable health equity, the current global system causes the premature loss of approximately 16 million human lives every year, and the destruction of hundreds of millions of life-years—not through unavoidable fate, but through preventable inequality, deprivation, environmental degradation, and organized neglect.

At the same time, this system is destroying the living foundations of human existence—soil, water, climate, biodiversity—undermining the very possibility of human survival beyond this century.

Faced with this reality, despair would be understandable.

But despair would also be a surrender.

So we stand here to say: we have a dream.

We have a dream that humanity will remember that all life is sacred, and that humans are part of the web of life—not its owners, not its masters.

We have a dream of communities that regenerate ecosystems instead of exhausting them; that heal land and water instead of sacrificing them; that choose care for biodiversity as a condition for their own future.

We have a dream of ways of living rooted in compassion, where nourishment does not depend on systematic suffering, and where health is understood as relational—between bodies, communities, and ecosystems.

We have a dream of solidary self-sufficiency: communities that reclaim the essentials of life through simplicity, cooperation, and mutual support, reducing dependence on an alienating and destructive global market.

We have a dream of decision-making without domination—where power is shared, consent matters, and freedom is inseparable from responsibility. A world where hierarchies give way to participation, and wisdom emerges from collective intelligence.

We have a dream of coexistence grounded in empathy, where work, care, rest, affection, and healing are valued equally; where loneliness is not ignored; where violence is not normalized; where dignity is protected in everyday life.

And we have a dream of a global network of sovereign, interrelated communities—rooted in their territories, open to one another, sharing knowledge, seeds, and solidarity for the common good. A network that transcends borders without erasing diversity, and cooperation without domination.

This dream is not a fantasy postponed to tomorrow.

It is a direction already visible wherever people choose life over profit, cooperation over competition, and care over control.

With this dream, we refuse the idea that there is no alternative.

With this dream, we reject the lie that violence is inevitable.

With this dream, we commit ourselves—not to perfection, but to coherence.

Let this be the generation that chose life.

Let this be the moment when humanity changed course.

Let this be the time when people everywhere stood up and said: enough.

Enough of an economy that kills.

Enough of a politics that excludes.

Enough of a culture that numbs.

We have a dream—and we will live it into being.

People of the world standing against the violence of capitalism

News Flash 649: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Seagulls at rest, Cyprus

News Flash 649

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

Registration: Fifth meeting of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the WHO Pandemic Agreement (IGWG5) 9 February 2026 – 14 February 2026

One Year Later: The Effect of US ‘Chainsaw’ on Global Health

US Congress Says Yes to Foreign Aid—Now Comes the Hard Part

[PODCAST] One year after Trump: The day HIV funding changed forever — and what came next

Health Policy At A Crossroads: What To Watch In 2026

America First in global health: a lesson in the consequences of ‘might is right’?

Africa pushes back on US health deals over data, power

Hundreds of Medical Groups Challenge Childhood Immunization Schedule Changes—Here’s What to Know

EU Parliament Backs Critical Medicines Act, Sparking Supply Concerns in Africa

Webinar registration: Rethinking Corporate Accountability in Global Health: Beyond Rankings & Voluntary Measures January 21st, 2026

Webinar registration: Blended Financing for Healthcare in Palestine Jan 23, 2026

Webinar registration: PABS Negotiations in the Final Stretch Towards a fair pandemic system or cementing voluntary mechanisms? Jan 23, 2026

2026: Striving for justice in an age of self-interest

Global Health Advances in 2025 Despite Historic Challenges

Here’s what’s on South Africa’s 2026 public health agenda

People’s Health Dispatch Bulletin #112: The struggle for health is a struggle against imperialism

Solidarity in a world that won’t sit still

Nonviolent Struggles for Peoples’ Rights: Lessons from History and Today

Surging billionaire wealth leads to ‘dangerous’ political risks, Oxfam warns as Davos forum opens

Podcast Trailblazers with Garry: a conversation with John Gyapong

Lenacapavir: The HIV Prevention Breakthrough Indians Can’t Access

Reducing antibiotic exposure to combat antimicrobial resistance: rethinking use, packaging, and dispensing practices

The Bacterial Detective Trying to Stop Superbugs in Nigeria

Battery Recycling Is a Far Bigger Source of Lead Exposure Than We Thought

The shared challenges of giving birth

HRR 801. WHEN PEOPLE DECIDE THAT FOOD IS NOT A COMMODITY BUT IS LIFE ITSELF, CORPORATE BLACKMAIL WILL LOSE ITS POWER. (Mauricio Herrera Kahn.

Global Social movements rally around ICARRD+20 as struggles over land, natural commons, and territories intensify

World Enters “Era of Global Water Bankruptcy”

After Court Rebuke, Government Releases Unified Report Identifying Sources of Delhi Pollution

Bill Gates charity trust’s holdings in fossil fuel firms rise despite divestment claims

 

 

 

 

News Flash 648: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Panarea island, Italy

News Flash 648

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

Webinar registration: Taking stock of the Draft Global Plan of Action for Indigenous Peoples’ Health Jan 19, 2026

Webinar Registration: Defunding Communicable Diseases: New Forms of Colonialism Jan 21, 2026

Webinar Registration: Moving Beyond Addiction: A Health-Centered Approach to Substance UseJan 21, 2026

Webinar Registration: Serious Food Safety Failings expose global health risks of unregulated online cross-border promotion Jan 21, 2026

Webinar Registration: Unpacking the landscape and power dynamics of public-private partnerships in global health governance Jan 20, 2026

Meeting registration: European Youth in Action against Greenwashing Feb 6, 2026

Walking with communities: why local facilitators matter?

What Do We Want Out of Poverty Measures?

Stop Pretending Pharmacists Can’t Meet Primary Care Needs

Can a weakened US CDC continue its global health work?

The US Just Changed Vaccine Guidance. Can AI Help Families Decide?

Vaccines to prevent bacterial sexually transmitted infections: Promise, progress, and public health potential

Bacterial sexually transmitted infections in incarcerated populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

An early present for 2026: Innovative near-poc pulslife TB test available in GDF Catalogue for $3.60

A rapid review of the causes of diagnostic and treatment delays for tuberculosis in low-burden countries

Cocaine use in Europe: the need for cross-sectoral collaboration between security, justice, health, and social systems

The role of health literacy in boosting citizen engagement in appropriate use of antibiotics

Trend analysis and modelling of universal health coverage, Ethiopia

The Lancet podcast: Hongqiao Fu and Tiange Chen on health taxes in China

Country Taxes on Alcohol and Sugary Drinks are ‘Too Low to be Effective’, WHO Finds

HRR800. HUMAN RIGHTS READERS: 3000+ PAGES AND COUNTING

Millions Of Women Don’t Have Access To Maternity Care – And The Number Is Growing

Sudan: 1000 days of war deepen the world’s worst health and humanitarian crisis

Gaza to Sudan: Moral consistency as a colonial alibi

Gaza: Storms worsen already dire humanitarian situation, UN warns

Quarter of developing countries poorer than in 2019, World Bank finds

Caesarean deliveries and double burden of malnutrition: a multicountry analysis in South and Southeast Asia

These 5 questions will define the future of aid in 2026

World’s richest 1% have already used fair share of emissions for 2026, says Oxfam

Burning plastic waste ‘widespread’ in poor communities

Global temperatures dipped in 2025 but more heat records on way, scientists warn

Tracking the Invisible: Monitoring Air Pollution from Space